Name and shame . . .
The US administration is making it easier to discover the individuals who are the main recipients of America's massive distribution of subsidies to farmers according to CBC news. The trouble is they don't seem to have any shame.
« Is there life after subsidies? | Main | The Wilder side of subsidies »
June 12, 2007
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453d45469e200e008c3ec5f8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Name and shame . . .:
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
June 2009
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 |
http://www.scharfesex.com/
Posted by: poppen | August 31, 2008 at 12:16 PM
The CAP subsidises food production. Just as we subsidise health, education, and houses. If we do not subsidise food production, then we will have more famines, and have our food security destroyed. You should campaign for Africa to have have CAP.
www.lonympics.co.uk/CAP.htm
Posted by: Name | August 30, 2007 at 02:33 PM
Thanks for pointing that out. Sadly I can't find the original link so have just scrubbed the wrong one out
Posted by: Victor Keegan | June 20, 2007 at 11:59 AM
I don't think your link in this post in correct ...
Posted by: cljo | June 12, 2007 at 08:08 PM