The corporations that farm money

A timely reminder from  the Daily sTelegraph abou how many of the subsidies suppposedly channelled (inefficiently) to agriculture aren't actually going to farmers  but to corporations

Comments

[Houston Home Security]

I want to show my admiration of your writing skill and ability to make audience, browse the whole thing to the end. I'd really like to read more of your blogs and to talk about my views with you. I'll be your frequent website visitor, that’s for sure.

[Smart Home]

I am searching for some useful information and process is doing that I cannot require the correct information for the searching time. Then after I am working for the reference information is visible in this website. I am very much thanks to this website and nice approach is visible in this blog. This information is useful for me. Thanks you very much for providing the nice info in this blog.

[Houston Alarm Companies]

Thanks so much with this fantastic new web site. I'm very fired up to show it to anyone. It makes me so satisfied your vast understanding and wisdom have a new channel for trying into the world.

[Houston Alarms]

You certainly deserve a round of applause for your post and more specifically, your blog in general. Very high quality material.

[Atlanta Alarms]

Many thanks for this brilliant post! Many points have extremely useful. Hopefully you'll continue sharing your knowledge around.

[Procrastination Free Living]

Thank you for Reminding us!! Its nice to read that!!.. have a nice day always!!!!!!!!!

[Brad Wilson]

The program is absurd, BUT, the bigger beneficiaries are the buyers of grain & other commodities. Subsidies don't lower or raise prices. Economically the lack of price responsiveness causes it. The policy cause (US, which is price leader for major commodities,) the lowering (1953-1995) and elimination (96-) of nonsubsidy price floors and supply management. Top side: lack of price ceilings and reserves. US has market share, is price leader, BUT, unlike OPEC, chooses to lower market prices, to lose money on farm exports (ie. 1981-2006). Top side we had 3 price spikes in the 20th century. We had excellent policies & programs 1942-1952 (& zero commodity subsidies). Proof: click on my name.

[persuasive essay]

You wrote a very good and informative blog, I really didn't know about that issue, but you not only be informed me but I also getting knowledge of your article, what can say about that issue, only hope that i will solve soon, and last of all Thanks for the convey.
Best regards.

Persuasive Essay

[runescape money]

Living without an aim is like sailing without a compass.

[masini]

Agriculture is in great danger. Only farmers, through their sustained effort can do something.
dezmembrari auto

[JESSICAmQ29]

Oh, it is very infrequent ideas about this post! Even the freelance writing will not easy make do with this.

[Vic Keegan]

Thanks, Taylor - that's very interesting

[Vic Keegan]

Thanks, Taylor - that's very interesting

[www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=714999308]

Dispatch from Central Texas: our lakes are dry as we still are making deliveries to downstream irrigators (subsidized rice farming). Subsidized ag raises our feed prices for cattle, and discourages our private land owners (~95% of land area in Texas) to not keep lands in conservation use. Water allocations are part of the subsidy mess. Keep it up and keep it loud.